Bail Act 1982 - Schedule

Bail Act 1982	2 May 2005 TO Current Word Version PDF Version

Schedule 1

[Heading amended by No. 45 of 1993 s. 10(1).]

[Sections 13 and 17]

Part A ¾ Jurisdiction to grant bail

First Column *Appearances in court referred* *to in section 13*	Second Column *By whom bail may be* *granted*
1. Initial appearance (1) The initial appearance in a court of summary jurisdiction or the Children's Court by an accused in, or in connection with, proceedings for an offence.	In any case ¾ (a) a justice; or (b) an authorised police officer; and in addition, in the case of a child, an authorised community services officer.
(2) The initial appearance in the District Court or the Supreme Court, not being the initial appearance to which clause 3 applies.	A judge of the District Court or a judge of the Supreme Court, as the case requires.
[Clause 1 amended by No. 15 of 1988 s. 19; No. 49 of 1988 s. 90(a)(i); No. 59 of 2004 s. 141; No. 84 of 2004 s. 10(1) and 82.]
2. Appearance after adjournment Appearance in any court or before a judicial officer by an accused after any adjournment of proceedings for an offence, not being a committal under clause 3.	The judicial officer who orders the adjournment.
[Clause 2 amended by No. 84 of 2004 s. 82.]
3. Appearance on committal to Supreme Court or District Court
The initial appearance by an accused in the Supreme Court or District Court after he has been committed thereto under any Act to be tried or sentenced or otherwise dealt with.	The judicial officer who orders the committal.
[Clause 3 amended by No. 84 of 2004 s. 82.]
4. Appearance in connection with appeal etc.
(1) Appearance in connection with an application or appeal made under the Criminal Appeals Act 2004 or with any order made in determining the application or appeal.	If the appeal is being determined by a single judge of the Supreme Court, a single judge of the Supreme Court; If the appeal is being determined by the Court of Appeal, the Court of Appeal or a single judge of appeal.
(2) Appearance in connection with a rehearing of proceedings ordered under section 28 of the Children's Court of Western Australia Act 1988.	The Children's Court.
(3) Appearance in connection with the reconsideration of an order under section 40 of the Children's Court of Western Australia Act 1988.	The Children's Court constituted by the President.
[Clause 4 inserted by No. 84 of 2004 s. 10(2).]
5. Appearance prescribed by regulation
Appearance in a court for any other purpose or following any other occurrence prescribed by regulations under this Act.	The judicial or other officer prescribed by such regulations.
6. Appearances not otherwise provided for
Any appearance in a court not otherwise provided for in this Part or by regulations under this Act.	The judicial officer who, or court which, orders the appearance.

7. Interpretation in this Part

In this Part, unless the contrary intention appears ¾

}proceedings for an offence~ in clause 2 (but not in clause 1) includes any of the following proceedings relating to that offence ¾

(a) appeal proceedings;

(b) proceedings on a writ of habeas corpus; and

[Clause 7 inserted by No. 84 of 2004 s. 10(3).]

Part B ¾ Cessation of power to grant bail

1. Upon decision by Judge, power of other officers ceases

After a Judge of the Supreme Court has granted or refused bail for an appearance by an accused the power to grant bail for that appearance ceases to be vested in any judicial officer whose jurisdiction is inferior to that of such Judge or in any authorised officer.

[Clause 1 amended by No. 84 of 2004 s. 82.]

2. Upon decision by judicial officer, his power and that of his peers ceases

Except where clause 4 applies, the power to grant bail for an appearance by an accused ceases to be vested in any judicial officer (including a Judge of the Supreme Court) after he, or another judicial officer whose jurisdiction is co-extensive with his, has granted or refused bail for that appearance.

[Clause 2 amended by No. 84 of 2004 s. 82.]

3. Upon refusal by justice power of authorised officer or justice ceases

After a justice has refused bail for an initial appearance by an accused, the power to grant bail for that appearance ceases to be vested in an authorised officer or another justice, but an authorised officer or a justice may grant bail for an initial appearance notwithstanding that one or more other authorised officers have previously refused bail for that appearance.

[Clause 3 amended by No. 34 of 1988 s. 90(b); No. 59 of 2004 s. 141; No. 84 of 2004 s. 82.]

4. Judicial officer's powers where accused proves new facts or changed circumstances

Notwithstanding clause 2, where an accused has been refused bail for an appearance or has been granted bail therefor on terms or conditions with which he is unable or unwilling to comply, the judicial officer who granted or refused bail or another judicial officer whose jurisdiction is co-extensive with his has power to grant bail for that appearance or to vary the terms or conditions of bail previously granted therefor if the accused makes application and satisfies him that ¾

(a) new facts have been discovered, new circumstances have arisen or the circumstances have changed since bail was previously granted or refused for that appearance;

(b) he failed to adequately present his case for bail on the previous occasion when it was considered; or

(c) where bail was granted subject to a home detention condition, he has, since the previous occasion when his case for bail was considered, complied with the home detention condition for a period of one month or more.

[Clause 4 amended by No. 61 of 1990 s. 14; No. 84 of 2004 s. 82.]

Part C ¾ Manner in which jurisdiction to be exercised

Principles governing grant or refusal of bail

1. Bail before conviction to be at discretion of bail authority, except for a child

Subject to clause 3A, the grant or refusal of bail to an accused, other than a child, who is in custody awaiting an appearance in court before conviction for an offence shall be at the discretion of the judicial officer or authorised officer in whom jurisdiction is vested, and that discretion shall be exercised having regard to the following questions as well as to any others which he considers relevant ¾

(a) whether, if the accused is not kept in custody, he may ¾

(i) fail to appear in court in accordance with his bail undertaking;

(ii) commit an offence;

(iii) endanger the safety, welfare, or property of any person; or

(iv) interfere with witnesses or otherwise obstruct the course of justice, whether in relation to himself or any other person;

(b) whether the accused needs to be held in custody for his own protection;

(d) whether, as regards the period when the accused is on trial, there are grounds for believing that, if he is not kept in custody, the proper conduct of the trial may be prejudiced;

(e) whether there is any condition which could reasonably be imposed under Part D which would ¾

(i) sufficiently remove the possibility referred to in paragraphs (a) and (d);

(ii) obviate the need referred to in paragraph (b); or

(iii) remove the grounds for opposition referred to in paragraph (c);

(f) where the accused is charged with an offence that is alleged to have been committed in respect of a child, whether a condition should be imposed under Part D requiring the accused to reside at a place other than the place where the child resides;

(g) whether the alleged circumstances of the offence or offences amount to wrongdoing of such a serious nature as to make a grant of bail inappropriate.

[Clause 1 amended by No. 14 of 1992 s. 11; No. 45 of 1993 s. 10(2)(a); No. 54 of 1998 s. 8(a) and (b); No. 84 of 2004 s. 82.]

2. Child to have qualified right to bail

(1) In this clause ¾

}responsible person~ means a parent, relative, employer or other person who, in the opinion of the judicial officer or authorised officer, is in a position to both influence the conduct of the child and provide the child with support and direction.

(2) Subject to subclause (3), a child accused who is in custody awaiting an appearance in court before conviction for an offence has a right to be granted bail unless ¾

(a) in the opinion of the judicial officer or authorised officer in whom jurisdiction is vested ¾

(i) one or more of the questions set out in clause 1(a), (b), (d) and (g) must be answered in the affirmative; and

(ii) there is no condition which he could reasonably impose under Part D which would satisfy the relevant provision of clause 1(e);

(b) there is no responsible person willing to enter into an undertaking of the kind described in subclause (3)(c),

and if the child is refused bail he shall be dealt with in accordance with section 19(2) of the Young Offenders Act 1994.

(3) The right of a child accused under subclause (2) is subject to ¾

(a) clause 3A;

(b) section 28(2) of the Child Welfare Act 1947; and

(c) there being imposed as a condition on the grant of bail a requirement that before the release of the child on bail a responsible person undertakes in writing in the prescribed form to ensure that the child complies with any requirement of his bail undertaking mentioned in section 28(2)(a), (b), (c) and (d).

(4) Subclauses (2)(b) and (3)(c) do not apply to a child accused if it appears to the judicial officer or authorised officer that the accused ¾

(a) is over the age of 17 years; and

(b) has sufficient maturity to live independently without the guidance or control of a parent or guardian.

(5) For the purposes of this clause, the provisions of sections 46, 47, 48, 54, 55(2), 60 and 67(2)(a)(iv) apply with all necessary changes as if ¾

(a) references in those provisions to a surety and a surety undertaking were references to a responsible person and to an undertaking referred to in subclause (3)(c) respectively; and

(b) section 54(1)(b)(i) read as follows ¾

}

(i) a person who has entered into an undertaking referred to in clause 2(3)(c) of Part C of Schedule 1 should no longer be regarded as a responsible person for the purposes of that clause, or is dead;

(6) Where a child accused is released on bail his right to be at liberty is subject to the exercise of the powers in section 17A.

[Clause 2 inserted by No. 45 of 1993 s. 10(2)(b); amended by No. 57 of 1997 s. 21(3)(a); No. 54 of 1998 s. 8(c); No. 84 of 2004 s. 82.]

3. Matters relevant to consideration of clause 1(a)

In considering whether an accused may do any of the things mentioned in clause 1(a), the judicial officer or authorised officer shall have regard to the following matters, as well as to any others which he considers relevant ¾

(a) the nature and seriousness of the offence or offences (including any other offence or offences for which he is awaiting trial) and the probable method of dealing with the accused for it or them, if he is convicted;

(b) the character, previous convictions, antecedents, associations, home environment, background, place of residence, and financial position of the accused;

(d) the strength of the evidence against him.

[Clause 3 amended by No. 84 of 2004 s. 82.]

3A. Bail where serious offence committed while accused on bail for another serious offence

(1) Notwithstanding clause 1 or 2 or any other provision of this Act, where ¾

(a) an accused is in custody awaiting an appearance in court before conviction for a serious offence; and

(b) the serious offence is alleged to have been committed while the accused was ¾

(i) on bail for; or

(ii) at liberty under an early release order made in respect of,

another serious offence,

the judicial officer or (if section 16A does not apply) the authorised officer in whom jurisdiction is vested shall refuse to grant bail for the serious offence referred to in paragraph (a) unless the judicial officer or authorised officer ¾

(c) is satisfied that there are exceptional reasons why the accused should not be kept in custody and, if clause 3B applies, is so satisfied only after complying with that clause; and

(d) is also satisfied that bail may properly be granted having regard to the provisions of clauses 1 and 3 or, in the case of a child accused, clauses 2 and 3.

(2) Notwithstanding section 7(1), where an accused is refused bail under subclause (1) for an appearance for a serious offence his case for bail need not be considered again under that subsection for an appearance for that offence unless he satisfies the judicial officer who may order his detention that ¾

(a) new facts have been discovered, new circumstances have arisen or the circumstances have changed since bail was refused; or

(b) he failed to adequately present his case for bail on the occasion of that refusal.

(3) Where a child accused is refused bail under subclause (1) he shall be dealt with in accordance with section 19(2) of the Young Offenders Act 1994.

[Clause 3A inserted by No. 45 of 1993 s. 10(2)(c); amended by No. 57 of 1997 s. 21(3)(b); No. 54 of 1998 s. 7 and 13(1); No.84 of 2004 s. 82.]

3B. Determination of exceptional reasons under clause 3A(1)

(1) This clause applies where it appears to the judicial officer or (if section 16A does not apply) the authorised officer that all or any of the acts alleged to constitute a serious offence referred to in clause 3A(1)(b) would, if proved in the appropriate proceedings, amount to a breach by the accused of a protective condition or order.

(2) The judicial officer or authorised officer shall, before making a decision that there are exceptional reasons for the purposes of clause 3A(1)(c), make enquiry, or cause enquiry to be made, whether there has already been ¾

(a) any breach by the accused of the protective condition or order that has been proved in proceedings;

(b) any alleged breach by the accused of the protective condition or order that has not been so proved, including an allegation that has not been the subject of a prosecution or any other communication to any relevant official; or

(c) any alleged breach by the accused of any other protective condition or order that has been the subject of a prosecution.

(3) On becoming aware of any such alleged breach, the judicial officer or authorised officer shall give each person for whose protection a protective condition or order referred to in subclause (2) was imposed or made (a }relevant person~) a reasonable opportunity to give evidence by affidavit on matters relating to that protective condition or order.

(4) The judicial officer or authorised officer shall in making any decision for the purposes of clause 3A(1)(c) ¾

(a) give due weight to ¾

(i) any evidence given under subclause (3);

(ii) any adverse effect that a grant of bail to the accused would have on a relevant person; and

(iii) any difficulty that a relevant person might have in proving any future breach of a protective condition or order;

(b) consider whether it would be appropriate to refuse bail and make a hospital order under section 5 of the Criminal Law (Mentally Impaired Accused) Act 1996;

(c) in the case of a condition imposed for a purpose mentioned in clause 2(2)(c) or (d) of Part D, treat any alleged breach of the condition as a serious matter even if the conduct alleged to amount to the breach in itself appears to be trivial; and

(d) consider whether any alleged breach of a protective condition or order that has occurred shows that the purpose of the condition or order has not been achieved and that the accused should be kept in custody.

(5) The provisions of this clause do not limit the matters that the judicial officer or authorised officer may take into account for the purposes of clause 3A(1)(c).

(6) In this clause ¾

}protective condition or order~ means ¾

(a) a condition imposed for a purpose mentioned in clause 2(2)(c) or (d) of Part D;

(b) a violence restraining order or a police order under the Restraining Orders Act 1997; or

(i) that under section 86 of the Restraining Orders Act 1997 is taken to be a misconduct restraining order under that Act; and

(ii) that shows on the face of the order that the causing or threatening of personal injury by the accused was a ground for the making of the order.

[Clause 3B inserted by No. 54 of 1998 s. 13(2); amended by No. 38 of 2004 s. 60; No. 59 of 2004 s. 141; No. 84 of 2004 s. 11 and 82.]

4. When bail to be granted after conviction

In deciding whether or not to grant bail to an accused who is in custody waiting to be sentenced or otherwise dealt with for an offence of which he has been convicted or awaiting the disposal of appeal proceedings, the judicial officer shall, subject to clauses 5 and 6, consider whether ¾

(a) in the case of an accused waiting to be sentenced, there is a strong likelihood that he will impose a non-custodial sentence; or

(b) in either case, there are exceptional reasons why the accused should not be kept in custody,

and shall only grant bail to him if he is satisfied that ¾

(c) in the case of an accused waiting to be sentenced, at least one of those reasons exists and, in the case of an appellant, the reason mentioned in paragraph (b) exists; and

(d) he may properly do so having regard to the provisions of clauses 1 and 3 or, in the case of a child, clauses 2 and 3.

[Clause 4 amended by No. 84 of 2004 s. 82.]

5. Exception for bail for an appeal under the Criminal Procedure (Summary) Act 1902

Clause 4 does not apply to the bail of a person who is awaiting the disposal of appeal proceedings under Part 2 of the Criminal Appeals Act 2004; such a person shall be deemed for the purposes of this Part to be awaiting an appearance in court before conviction for an offence.

[Clause 5 inserted by No. 33 of 1989 s. 18; amended by No. 59 of 2004 s. 141; No. 84 of 2004 s. 11 and 82.]

6. Bail of people on community orders, etc.

For the purpose of determining whether clause 4 applies, a person in custody ¾

(a) under section 50, 79, 128, 129 or 132 of the Sentencing Act 1995 in connection with a possible breach of a conditional release order, a sentence of suspended imprisonment or a community order imposed under that Act; or

(b) under section 43 of the Young Offenders Act 1994 in respect of an alleged breach of a youth community based order, an intensive youth supervision order or a conditional release order made under that Act,

is to be taken as not having been convicted of the offence for which the sentence was imposed.

[Clause 6 inserted by No. 78 of 1995 s. 8.]

Limitation on period of bail

7. Bail for initial appearance to be for not more than 7 days

In fixing the terms of bail of an accused for his initial appearance in court for an offence, a justice or an authorised officer shall require him to make the appearance within the period of 7 days commencing on and including the day on which the accused was arrested for the offence.

[Clause 7 amended by No. 84 of 2004 s. 82.]

8. Bail on adjournment in petty sessions to be for not more than 30 days except by consent

In fixing the terms of bail of an accused for an appearance in court after an adjournment of proceedings for an offence, a judicial officer sitting as a court of summary jurisdiction shall require him to make the appearance within the period of 30 days commencing on and including the day on which the proceedings are adjourned, unless the accused consents to appear on a later day.

[Clause 8 amended by No. 49 of 1988 s. 90(c); No. 59 of 2004 s. 141; No. 84 of 2004 s. 82.]

9. Provision as to calculation of time

The periods specified in clauses 7 and 8 shall be calculated to include any Sunday or public holiday.

Part D ¾ Conditions which may be imposed on a grant of bail

1. Conditions as to forfeiture and giving security may be imposed on the accused and sureties

(1) A judicial officer or authorised officer, on a grant of bail, may impose conditions under this clause if he considers that it is desirable to do so to ensure the performance of the accused's bail undertaking.

(2) If a judicial officer or authorised officer considers that it is desirable as mentioned in subclause (1), he may in addition to releasing the accused on his bail undertaking impose any one or more of the following conditions ¾

(a) that the accused in his bail undertaking agree to forfeit a specified amount of money if he fails to comply with any requirement of his bail undertaking mentioned in section 28(2)(a) or (b)(ii);

(b) that a surety or a specified number of sureties enter into a surety undertaking or surety undertakings whereby he or they agree to forfeit a specified amount or specified amounts of money if the accused fails to comply with any requirement of his bail undertaking mentioned in section 28(2)(a) or (b)(ii);

(c) that any of them the accused and the surety or sureties give security of a specified value, including the deposit of a specified amount of cash, for the performance of their respective obligations;

(d) that any of them the accused and the surety or sureties deposit with a specified officer any specified passbook or document relating to the title to, or ownership of, any account or other asset offered as security for the performance of their respective obligations; or

(e) that any of them the accused and the surety or sureties, at his or their own expense or otherwise, enter into such mortgage, charge, assignment or other transaction, or take such other step, as may be required, including completion of the necessary documents, to render any security effective and enforceable by the State.

(3) The nature and sufficiency of any security, and the documentation therefor, required under subclause (2) shall be determined by the judicial officer or authorised officer who imposed the condition or, if no determination is so made ¾

(a) by the person before whom the bail undertaking is entered into, where the security is to be given by the accused; and

(b) where the security is to be given by a surety, by any person authorised under section 36 to approve the surety or before whom the surety undertaking is entered into.

(4) When a bail undertaking ceases to have effect as provided in section 34(a) to (d), or upon an accused being acquitted of a charge under section 51(1) or (2) or discharged from further proceedings therefor, each of them the accused, or where section 34(b) applies his personal representative, and any surety is entitled to have returned to him any security given under subclause (2).

(5) When a surety undertaking ceases to have effect as provided in section 47(a) to (f), a surety is entitled to have returned to him any security given under subclause (2).

[Clause 1 amended by No. 65 of 2003 s. 121(3); No. 84 of 2004 s. 82.]

2. Other conditions which may be imposed

(1) A judicial officer or authorised officer, on a grant of bail, may impose conditions ¾

(a) to be complied with before the accused is released on bail or while the accused is on bail;

(b) as to the accused's conduct while on bail; or

if he considers that it is desirable for any purpose mentioned in subclause (2), (2b), (3) or (4).

(1a) Without limiting subclause (1), a judicial officer or authorised officer shall, on a grant of bail to a child accused, consider whether it is desirable for any purpose mentioned in subclause (2) to impose a condition as to ¾

(a) any period in each day during which the child is to remain at a particular place;

(b) any person with whom the child is not to associate or communicate;

(d) the attendance by the child at a school or other educational institution; or

(e) any other matter,

and the judicial officer or authorised officer may impose any such condition.

(2) Any condition may be imposed under subclause (1) or (1a) to ensure that an accused ¾

(a) appears in court in accordance with his bail undertaking;

(b) does not while on bail commit an offence;

(d) does not interfere with witnesses or otherwise obstruct the course of justice, whether in relation to himself or any other person; or

(e) as regards the period when the accused is on trial, does not prejudice the proper conduct of the trial.

(2a) Before imposing a condition on a grant of bail for a purpose mentioned in subclause (2)(c) or (d) a judicial officer or authorised officer is to consider whether that purpose would be better served, or could be better assisted, by a restraining order made under the Restraining Orders Act 1997 and whether, in the case of a judicial officer, to exercise the power in section 63 of that Act or, in the case of an authorised officer, to make a telephone application under that Act.

(2b) Where a judicial officer is of the opinion that the accused should while on bail ¾

(a) be counselled for a behavioural problem; or

(b) attend a course or programme that may assist with such a problem,

the judicial officer may under subclause (1) impose a condition for that purpose that requires the accused to ¾

(d) attend a prescribed course or programme,

that is specified by the judicial officer in the condition.

(3) Where a judicial officer who grants bail to an accused is of the opinion that the accused's physical condition ought to be examined the officer may, under subclause (1), impose any condition which the officer considers desirable for the purpose of ensuring that the accused is examined by a medical practitioner.

(3a) Where a judicial officer who grants bail to an accused is of the opinion that the accused's mental condition ought to be examined the officer may, under subclause (1), impose any condition which the officer considers desirable for the purpose of ensuring that the accused's mental condition is examined including a condition ¾

(a) that the accused be examined by a medical practitioner or an authorised mental health practitioner (as defined in the Mental Health Act 1996) for the purpose of deciding whether to make a referral under section 29 of that Act;

(b) that the accused be admitted to an authorised hospital (as defined in the Mental Health Act 1996)

(4) Where a judicial officer is of the opinion that an accused is suffering from alcohol or drug abuse and is in need of care or treatment either on that account, or to enable him to be prepared for his trial, the judicial officer may, under subclause (1), impose any condition which he considers desirable for the purpose of ensuring that the accused receives such care or treatment, including that he lives in, or from time to time attends at, a specified institution or place in order to receive such care or treatment.

(5) Where a judicial officer imposes a condition for a purpose mentioned in subclause (2b), (3), (3a) or (4), the judicial officer shall cause to be sent to the person who is to counsel or examine the accused, or the place at which the accused is to attend, a statement of the reasons for imposing the condition.

(6) Where a condition is imposed under this clause that an accused shall reside in premises established for the accommodation of persons to whom bail has been granted, that condition shall be deemed to include a further condition that the accused shall comply with such rules as are for the time being laid down for the maintenance of the good order of those premises, whether such rules are made under section 67 or by the authority responsible for the good order of the premises.

(7) In this clause ¾

}medical practitioner~ means a medical practitioner within the meaning of the Medical Act 1894; and

}psychiatrist~ has the same meaning as it has in the Mental Health Act 1996.

[Clause 2 amended by No. 45 of 1993 s. 10(3); No. 69 of 1996 s. 3; No. 54 of 1998 s. 12; No. 84 of 2004 s. 82.]

3. Home detention condition may be imposed

(1) A judicial officer may, subject to this clause, impose a home detention condition as a condition on a grant of bail.

(2) A home detention condition shall not be imposed unless the accused is over the age of 17 years and the judicial officer is satisfied ¾

(a) after considering a report from a community corrections officer about the accused and his circumstances, that the accused is suitable to be subject to a home detention condition;

(b) that the place where it is proposed the accused will remain while subject to the home detention condition is a suitable place; and

(3) A home detention condition is a condition that while the accused is on bail the accused shall ¾

(a) remain at and not leave the place specified in the bail record form and in the bail undertaking (or in a notice under section 50E) until the time specified, or deemed by section 31(3) to be specified, in the bail undertaking except ¾

(i) to work in gainful employment approved by a community corrections officer;

(ii) with the approval of a community corrections officer, to seek gainful employment;

(iii) to obtain urgent medical or dental treatment for the accused;

(iv) for the purpose of averting or minimizing a serious risk of death or injury to the accused or to another person;

(v) to obey an order issued under a written law (such as a summons) requiring the accused's presence elsewhere;

(vi) for a purpose approved of by a community corrections officer; or

(vii) on the direction of a community corrections officer;

(b) not leave the State;

(d) comply with such of the conditions specified in the list provided under section 24A(4) as may be specified in a notice given under section 50E(b); and

(e) when requested to do so, produce a copy of his bail undertaking and any notice by the CEO (Justice) under section 50E for inspection by a community corrections officer or a member of the Police Force.

[Clause 3 inserted by No. 61 of 1990 s. 15; amended by No. 31 of 1993 s. 9; No. 84 of 2004 s. 82.]

Schedule 2

[Heading inserted by No. 45 of 1993 s. 11.]

[Section 3(1)]

Serious offences

	*Enactment*	*Description of offence*
1.	*The Criminal Code*
	s. 278 (as read with s. 282)	Wilful murder
	s. 279 (as read with s. 282)	Murder
	s. 280 (as read with s. 287)	Manslaughter
	s. 292	Disabling in order to commit indictable offence
	s. 294	Acts intended to cause grievous bodily harm or to resist or prevent arrest
	s. 297	Grievous bodily harm
	s. 301	Wounding and similar acts
	s. 304(2)	Acts or omissions, with intent to harm, causing bodily harm or danger
	s. 317	Assault occasioning bodily harm
	s. 317A(a)	Assault with intent to commit or facilitate a crime
	s. 317A(b)	Assault with intent to do grievous bodily harm
	s. 318	Serious assaults
	s. 323	Indecent assault
	s. 324	Aggravated indecent assault
	s. 325	Sexual penetration without consent
	s. 326	Aggravated sexual penetration without consent
	s. 331B	Sexual servitude
	s. 331C	Conducting business involving sexual servitude
	s. 331D	Deceptive recruiting for commercial sexual services
	s. 332	Kidnapping
	s. 333	Deprivation of liberty
	s. 338E	Stalking
	s. 378	Stealing a motor vehicle
	s. 392	Robbery
	s. 393	Assault with intent to rob
	s. 401	Burglary
	s. 444	Criminal damage, if the property is destroyed or damaged by fire
2.	*Bush Fires Act 1954*
	s. 32	Wilfully lighting a fire or causing a fire to be lit under such circumstances as to be likely to injure or damage a person or property
2a.	*Misuse of Drugs Act 1981*
	s. 6(1)	Offences concerned with prohibited drugs generally
	s. 7(1)	Offences concerned with prohibited plants generally
	s. 33(1)(a)	Attempting to commit an offence under section 6(1) or 7(1)
	s. 33(2)(a)	Conspiracy to commit an offence under s. 6(1) or 7(1)
2b.	*Restraining Orders Act 1997*
	s. 61(1)	Breach of a violence restraining order
	s. 61(2a)	Breach of a police order
	s. 86(2)	Breach of a Part VII order under the Justices Act 1902 ¾ (a) that under section 86 of the Restraining Orders Act 1997 is taken to be a misconduct restraining order under that Act; and (b) that shows on the face of the order that the causing or threatening of personal injury by the accused was a ground for the making of the order.
3.	*Road Traffic Act 1974*
	s. 59	Dangerous driving causing death, injury, etc.
	s. 59A	Dangerous driving causing bodily harm

[Schedule 2 inserted by No. 45 of 1993 s. 11; amended by No. 82 of 1994 s. 13; No. 38 of 1998 s. 4(2); No. 54 of 1998 s. 15; No. 23 of 2001 s. 10(1); No. 4 of 2004 s. 24 and 26; No. 38 of 2004 s. 61; No. 62 of 2004 s. 9(1); No. 84 of 2004 s. 82.]

- Bail Act 1982 - Schedule.pdf